Skip to content

Ogle v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 586 F.3d 143 (2d Cir. 2009)

In this Emerging Issues Analysis, James Lawniczak considers the Second Circuit’s holding that an unsecured creditor has a valid claim under a prepetition indemnity agreement for the expenditure of postpetition attorneys’ fees related to the litigation of issues under the underlying contract. The d Originally posted here: Ogle v

The rest is here:
Ogle v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 586 F.3d 143 (2d Cir. 2009)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *